Infinite regress philosophy

Is infinite regress possible?

So what is logically possible depends on the premisses we adopt. Obviously, if we assume that there cannot be infinite regresses , we will conclude that infinite regresses are impossible; and if we assume that everything must have a cause, then infinite regress is necessary.

What’s wrong with infinite regress?

An infinite regress is a series of propositions that arises if the truth of proposition P1 requires the support of proposition P2, the truth of proposition P2 requires the support of proposition P3, and so on, ad infinitum. Distinction is made between infinite regresses that are “vicious” and those that are not.

Why does St Thomas reject the possibility of an infinite regression?

Because he holds that effects are ontologically dependent on their causes, he holds that the relevant causal series are wholly derivative: the later members of such series serve as causes only insofar as they have been caused by and are effects of the earlier members.

Do you agree that infinite regress of causes is repugnant to reason?

2. I do agree that an infinite regress of causes is repugnant to reason , because all efficient causes have to have an original beginning, and regressing into infinity seems quite impossible.

Does Infinity exist in reality?

Although the concept of infinity has a mathematical basis, we have yet to perform an experiment that yields an infinite result. Even in maths, the idea that something could have no limit is paradoxical. For example, there is no largest counting number nor is there a biggest odd or even number.

You might be interested:  John lockes political philosophy

Is time finite or infinite?

Temporal finitism is the doctrine that time is finite in the past. The philosophy of Aristotle, expressed in such works as his Physics, held that although space was finite , with only void existing beyond the outermost sphere of the heavens, time was infinite .

What does Pascal’s wager mean?

Pascal’s wager is an argument in philosophy presented by the seventeenth-century French philosopher, theologian, mathematician and physicist, Blaise Pascal (1623–1662). It posits that humans bet with their lives that God either exists or does not.

What is the epistemic regress problem?

The epistemic regress problem is commonly posed as an argument for skepticism: to know any proposition P we must know a proposition Q that provides evidence for P, but this requires an endless regress of known propositions—a circle or an infinite regress —so, since we cannot acquire knowledge by means of such regresses ,

What is infinite regression cosmological argument?

The Cosmological Argument posits that there cannot be an actual infinite regress of causes, therefore there must be an uncaused First Cause that is beginningless and does not require a cause.

Who said an infinite regress of causes was impossible?

Thomas Aquinas

What is Aquinas second way?

Every causal chain must either be circular, or infinite, or it has a first cause. If something were the efficient cause of itself, it would be prior to itself. Nothing can be prior to itself.

Who is the first efficient and final causes according to Aquinas?

Now in efficient causes it is not possible to go on to infinity, because in all efficient causes following in order, the first is the cause of the intermediate cause , and the intermediate is the cause of the ultimate cause , whether the intermediate cause be several, or only one.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *