End justifies the means philosophy

Which philosopher said the end justifies the means?

Niccolò Machiavelli

What does the end justifies the means mean?

Definition of the end justifies the means —used to say that a desired result is so good or important that any method, even a morally bad one, may be used to achieve itThey believe that the end justifies the means and will do anything to get their candidate elected.

Do the ends justify the means philosophy?

A characteristic behavior in today’s society is the belief that the ends justifies the means . This means actions people take are justified regardless of how they go about achieving their desired end result. The statement that the ends justifies the means can be traced back to Niccolo Machiavelli.

Why the end doesn’t justify the means?

But as young kids, we learned that the “ end doesn’t justify the means .” In other words, a positive outcome isn’t, well, a good thing if the methods used were dishonest or harmful to others. On the contrary, cheating or avoiding hard classes might keep your GPA high, but using these means never justifies the end result.

Who said the end doesn’t justify the means?

The end justifies the means is a phrase of Sergey Nechayev, the 19th century Russian revolutionary. It means that if a goal is morally important enough, any method of getting it is acceptable. The idea is ancient, but it was not meant to justify unnecessary cruelty.

Does the end justify the means essay?

The End Justifies The Means Idea Essay . The question whether the end justifies the means will depend on the kind of goal or end a person would like to accomplish and the means they use. If both the means and the ends are similarly noble and good, there is no question because the ends are justified by the means .

You might be interested:  Teaching philosophy statement sample

What the end does to the mean?

Answer: JUSTIFIES.

Does the end justify the means utilitarianism?

Other contemporary forms of utilitarianism mirror the forms of consequentialism outlined below. would indeed deem the act morally justified . So, in short, yes, the ends do justify the means if the moral gains of the ends are greater than the moral losses by the means .

What is the consequentialist theory?

Consequentialism is a theory that suggests an action is good or bad depending on its outcome. An action that brings about more benefit than harm is good, while an action that causes more harm than benefit is not. The most famous version of this theory is Utilitarianism.

What is Consequentialism example?

For instance, most people would agree that lying is wrong. But if telling a lie would help save a person’s life, consequentialism says it’s the right thing to do. Two examples of consequentialism are utilitarianism and hedonism. Utilitarianism judges consequences by a “greatest good for the greatest number” standard.

Do ends always justify means argumentative essay?

The question whether the end justifies the means depends on the type of goal or end a person wants to achieve and the means they use. If both the means and the ends are equally noble and good, there is no question because the ends are justified by the means .

What is end ethic?

If a person is an end -in-themself it means their inherent value doesn’t depend on anything else – it doesn’t depend on whether the person is enjoying their life, or making other people’s lives better.

You might be interested:  Philosophy of punishment

Why might the premise that the means justify the ends lead you to return the pills?

Why might the premise that the means justify the ends lead you to return the pills ? Basic ethics. There are things that are right and others that are wrong, and the discussion ends . This level of clarity and solidity is the main strength of an ethics based on duties.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *