# Inductive argument philosophy

## What is an example of an inductive argument?

An example of inductive logic is, “The coin I pulled from the bag is a penny. Therefore, all the coins in the bag are pennies.” Even if all of the premises are true in a statement, inductive reasoning allows for the conclusion to be false. Here’s an example : “Harold is a grandfather.

## What are the 2 types of inductive arguments?

There are a few key types of inductive reasoning. Generalized. This is the simple example given above, with the white swans. Statistical. This form uses statistics based on a large and random sample set, and its quantifiable nature makes the conclusions stronger. Bayesian. Analogical. Predictive. Causal inference .

## How do inductive and deductive arguments differ?

Just as deductive arguments are meant to prove a conclusion, inductive arguments are meant to predict a conclusion. They do not create a definite answer for their premises, but they try to show that the conclusion is the most probable one given the premises.

## What is a philosophical argument?

In philosophy , an argument is a connected series of statements, including at least one premise, intended to demonstrate that another statement, the conclusion, is true. The process by which we reason in order to reach a conclusion is referred to as inference.

## What is a strong inductive argument?

To summarize, a strong inductive argument is one where it is improbable for the conclusion to be false, given that the premises are true. A weak inductive argument is one where the conclusion probably would not follow from the premises, if they were true.

## What is an example of deductive and inductive arguments?

An inductive argument can be affected by acquiring new premises (evidence), but a deductive argument cannot be. For example , this is a reasonably strong inductive argument : If the arguer believes that the truth of the premises definitely establishes the truth of the conclusion, then the argument is deductive .

You might be interested:  United states philosophy

## What does deductive mean?

1 : of, relating to, or provable by deriving conclusions by reasoning : of, relating to, or provable by deduction (see deduction sense 2a) deductive principles.

## What does induction mean in philosophy?

inductive reasoning

## What is the problem with induction?

The problem of induction is to find a way to avoid this conclusion , despite Hume’s argument. Thus, it is the imagination which is taken to be responsible for underpinning the inductive inference, rather than reason.

## What are some examples of deductive arguments?

Examples of deductive logic: All men are mortal. Joe is a man. Therefore Joe is mortal. Bachelors are unmarried men. Bill is unmarried. Therefore, Bill is a bachelor. To get a Bachelor’s degree at Utah Sate University, a student must have 120 credits. Sally has more than 130 credits.

## What is inductive and deductive logic?

Deductive reasoning is the process of reasoning from the general to the specific. Inductive reasoning is the process of reasoning from the specific to the general. Inductive reasoning is supported by inductive logic , for example: From specific propositions such as: This raven is a black bird.

## Are deductive arguments always true?

A deductive argument is said to be valid if and only if it takes a form that makes it impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion nevertheless to be false. Otherwise, a deductive argument is said to be invalid.

## What does argument mean?

1 : a reason or the reasoning given for or against a matter under discussion — compare evidence, proof. 2 : the act or process of arguing , reasoning, or discussing especially : oral argument .

You might be interested:  Philosophy of aristotle plato and socrates

## What are the 5 Steps to Analyzing an argument?

Terms in this set (47) The five steps of analyzing arguments include: Determining what the arguer MEANS, CONSECUTIVELY numbering arguments , identifying the argument’s MAIN CLAIM, DIAGRAMMING the argument , and CRITIQUING the argument .